Yelp Inc. v. Reviewvio Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20243:23-cv-06508California9,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YELP, INC., No. C 23-06508 WHA

Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

AND MOTION TO STRIKE

v.

REVIEWVIO, INC., d/b/a DANDY, Defendant. 15 INTRODUCTION In this trademark action, defendant moves to dismiss the first amended complaint or, alternatively, to strike allegations. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and the motion to strike is DENIED. STATEMENT Yelp, Inc. filed a complaint against ReviewVio, Inc. for unfair competition, trademark infringement, and trademark dilution under federal law, as well as for unfair competition, false advertising, and breach of contract under California law (Amd. Compl. ¶¶ 50–97). Both Yelp and ReviewVio are headquartered in California (id. ¶¶ 9–10). Yelp offers a service for businesses to advertise to consumers, and for consumers to review businesses (and discover new ones)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.