Khan

Khan v. Madsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20245:23-cv-06141California1,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN,

Case No. 23-cv-06141 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DENYING v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

HALEY MADSEN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 (Docket No. 27)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison staff at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), where he is currently housed. The “Final Amended Complaint” (FAC) filed on January 22, 2024, is the operative complaint in this matter. Dkt. No. 11. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed In Forma Pauperis was denied on March 14, 2024, such that the full filing fee was due before this matter could proceed. Dkt. No. 15. After several extensions of time, Plaintiff paid the full filing fee on May 3, 2024. Dkt. No. 24. Plaintiff filed a “notice/motions for update on screening and motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.