Lew
Lew v. Medical Eye Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: MOVEIT CUSTOMER DATA
SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 3083
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in three actions pending in the Eastern District of Arkansas and the Northern and Southern Districts of California and defendant M&T Bank Corporation in two Western District of New York actions (the M&T Bank actions) move under Panel Rule 7.1 to vacate the Panel’s orders conditionally transferring their respective actions, which are listed on the attached Schedule A, to MDL No. 3083. Principal MDL defendant Progress Software Corporation (Progress) and its subsidiary Ipswitch, Inc., oppose all four motions to vacate. Defendant Pension Benefit Information, LLC (PBI) in the Eastern District of Arkansas LOPFI action, and plaintiffs in six MDL No. 3083 actions also naming PBI as a defendant oppose the motion to vacate involving LOPFI. Defendant Medical Eye Services, Inc. (MESVision) in the Northern District of California Lew action and the Southern District of California Bosley action oppose the motions to vacate as to Lew and Bosley. Plaintiff in an MDL No. 3083 …