Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20245:17-cv-02915California7,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ENIGMA SOFTWARE GROUP USA LLC, Case No. 17-cv-02915-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

MALWAREBYTES INC., Re: ECF No. 179 Defendant.

Plaintiff Enigma Software Group USA, LLC (“Enigma” or “Plaintiff”) brings this suit alleging that Defendant Malwarebytes Inc. (“Malwarebytes” or “Defendant”) wrongfully categorized Plaintiff’s cybersecurity and anti-malware software as “malicious,” a “threat,” and as a Potentially Unwanted Program (“PUP”). In the operative Second Amended Complaint (the “SAC”), Plaintiff asserts claims for (1) violations of the Lanham Act; (2) violations of New York General Business Law (“NYGBL”) § 349; (3) tortious interference with contractual relations; and (4) tortious interference with business relations. See SAC, ECF No. 140. Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss Second Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.