Means
Means v. Lyft, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TABATHA MEANS, Case No. 24-cv-00177-MMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART LYFT'S MOTION
TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
LYFT, INC., COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.
12 Before the Court is defendant Lyft, Inc.’s (“Lyft”) “Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint,” filed April 5, 2024, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On May 10, 2024, plaintiff Tabitha Means (“Means”) filed opposition, to which Lyft, on May 24, 2024, replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Means, a resident of Florida, alleges that on April 28, 2019, she was sexually assaulted by her Lyft driver. (See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶ 9, 134–143, Doc. No. 22.) Specifically, she alleges that while she was…