Floyd
Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS,
v. MOTION TO REMAND, AND IN
FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15, 19 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 13), Plaintiff Micheal Devin Floyd’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 15), and Floyd’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 19). The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the June 13, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Floyd’s in forma pauperis application, DENIES Floyd’s motion to remand, and GRANTS Saber’s motion to dismiss.1 II. BACKGROUND Floyd, who is African American, opened an…