Maldonado

Maldonado v. Passon

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20244:23-cv-02394California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCIAZ MALDONADO, Case No. 23-cv-02394-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

v. AMEND

DR. KALESHER, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“CSATF”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging lack of medical treatment while housed at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). His amended complaint (Dkt. No. 17) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.