Oneto
Oneto v. Watson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROY J. ONETO, Case No. 22-cv-05206-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
MELVIN WATSON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss certain causes of action alleged in Plaintiff Roy J. Oneto’s First Amended Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for June 6, 2024, was vacated. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND The Complaint makes the following allegations, which the Court accepts as true for purposes of the motion to dismiss. See Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff Roy J. Oneto is former employee of Cakebread Cellars, a…