Escolar

Escolar v. Kijakazi

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20243:21-cv-02104California586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

E.B.E.,

Case No. 21-cv-02104-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER SECTION MARTIN O'MALLEY, 406(B) WITHOUT PREJUDICE 10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 31

12 Stuart T. Barasch (“counsel”), who represented E.B.E. in this matter under a contingency fee agreement, brings a Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Motion”), seeking an award of $40,894.25 in attorney fees for work before this Court. The Motion is DENIED without prejudice.1 First, where counsel files a motion for fees in an action for social security benefits, counsel must establish that the claimant actually received a copy of the motion. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1725(a)(7); Holder v. Astrue, No. CIV.05-3521-PHX (RCB), 2009 WL 1363538, at *3 (D. Ariz. May 7, 2009) (“There is no question but that, when making section 406(b) applications, as here, attorneys are required to give notice to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.