Anwari

Anwari v. Momand

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20243:22-cv-04357California8,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHARIFA ANWARI, Case No. 22-cv-04357-AMO

Petitioner,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 119, 120, 121 AHMAD MOMAND, Respondent.

12 Before the Court are three joint discovery letter briefs filed by the parties in this international child custody case. ECF 119, 120, 121. This order assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the relevant legal standards, and the arguments made by the parties. The Court resolves the parties’ discovery disputes as set forth below. I. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (“RFPs”) In ruling on the disputed RFPs, the Court STRIKES portions of Respondent’s discovery responses that state “[s]ubject to and without waiving” objections as well as any general objections because Respondent has failed to establish that such phrasing and general objections are proper. See Sandigo v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 17-CV-002727-BLF-NC, 2018 WL 4293339, at *2 (N.D. Cal. July 18, 2018) (“A response with ‘[s]ubject to and without waiving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.