In re InMarket Media Location Data Tracking Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20243:24-cv-00511California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AUTRY WILLIS, Case Nos. 3:24-cv-00511-JSC Plaintiff, 3:24-cv-00683-JSC 8 v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO INMARKET MEDIA, LLC, C AO PPN OS IO NL TI D INA TT EE R A IMND C M LAO ST SI O CN O UT NO S EL Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

13 KENNETH KRUGER,

Plaintiff, v.

INMARKET MEDIA, LLC, Defendant.

19 In these related actions, Plaintiffs bring data privacy claims against InMarket Media on behalf of putative nationwide classes and California subclasses. Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate and for appointment of interim class counsel is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 11.1) After carefully considering the motion and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the June 20, 2024 hearing, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. // 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.