Maslic
Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SASA MASLIC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-02556-BLF
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF SASA
v. MASLIC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR ORDER ALLOWING
ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., WITNESSES TO APPEAR REMOTELY Defendants. [Re: ECF 149]
13 This case is set for trial on Claim 9 of the corrected first amended complaint, which is a human trafficking claim asserted by Plaintiff Sasa Maslic (“Maslic”) against Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) under federal and state law. The final pretrial conference is scheduled for August 1, 2024, and jury selection is scheduled for September 13, 2024. Maslic has filed an administrative motion for an order to allow seventeen witnesses, including himself, to testify at trial by electronic means from remote locations in Europe. See Pl.’s Admin. Mot., ECF 149. Defendant Tesla opposes the motion. See Def.’s Opp. ECF 151. 21 …