Murugaiyan
Murugaiyan v. Ally Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SENTHIL MOHAN MURUGAIYAN, Case No. 23-cv-04871-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ALLY BANK, Defendant.
12 On April 4, 2024, this Court adopted Chief Magistrate Judge Ryu’s Report and Recommendation dismissing pro se plaintiff Senthil Mohan Murugaiyan’s complaint with leave to amend. ECF 17. Murugaiyan’s amended complaint was due May 3, 2024. Id. Because no amended complaint was filed as required, on May 17, 2024, the Court ordered Murugaiyan to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF 18. The order directed Murugaiyan to file a written response to the order to show cause by no later than June 7, 2024. Id. The order also provided that if Murugaiyan intended to move forward with this case, the amended complaint was to be filed by June 7, 2024. Id. The order further warned that if Murugaiyan did not file both …