Joseph

Joseph v. Amazon.com Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20245:23-cv-05176California2,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RHAWN JOSEPH, Case No. 23-cv-05176-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION & DENYING

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

AMAZON.COM INC., et al., JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11,

Pro se plaintiff Dr. Rhawn Joseph brings this action against defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC (“Amazon”) asserting several causes of action including breach of contract, fraud, and financial elder abuse related to his sale of books through Amazon’s Kindle Direct Publishing. Amazon has moved to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, arguing that Dr. Joseph’s agreement with Amazon included an agreement to arbitrate any dispute and delegated questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator. Before the Court is also Dr. Joseph’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Amazon’s motion to compel arbitration is granted and Dr. Joseph’s motion for summary judgment is denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.