Ramirez

Ramirez v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20244:22-cv-00859California1,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ANTHONY RAMIREZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00859-YGR (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: SECOND DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 86 Defendant.

13 Now pending before the court is a jointly-filed discovery dispute letter brief through which Defendant seeks a protective order such as to avoid its employees being subjected to multiple serial depositions, rather than each person only being deposed once. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 86) at 3-7. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument. As stated herein, Defendant’s request is granted. This putative class-action case alleges that Defendant Bank of America (“the Bank”) promised certain pandemic-era relief programs from overdraft fees and insufficient-funds fees which it never fully implemented, and terminated the limited changes it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.