Newton

Newton v. Eatmon

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20193:19-cv-00511California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEODORE J. NEWTON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00511-LAB-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

S. EATMON, a correctional officer, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 11] 16 17 Plaintiff Theodore J. Newton, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983, alleging that a correctional officer at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility used excessive force against him. [Doc. No. 1.] Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. [Doc. No. 11.] For the reasons outlined more fully below, the Court finds that plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel must be DENIED. [Doc. No. 11.] Plaintiff requests that the Court appoint counsel for several reasons. First, he contends that “imprisonment will greatly limit his ability to litigate.” [Doc. No. 11, a p. 1.] Second,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.