Venson

Venson v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20193:18-cv-02278California1,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD ALLAN VENSON, Case No. 18-cv-02278-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff, ORDER:

(1) APPROVING & v. ADOPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION

SERGEANT Q. JACKSON, et al., [ECF No. 50]

Defendants. AND

16 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

[ECF No. 40] 19 Plaintiff Clifford Venson (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initially filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 28, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on April 8, 2019, following this Court’s prior order approving and adopting a report and recommendation from Judge Barbara Major to grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss Defendant Warden Paramo with leave to amend. (ECF Nos. 33, 35.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants Jackson, Hernandez, Diaz, Durant, and Juarez, all correctional officers at Richard J. Donovan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.