Andrade-Heymsfield

Andrade-Heymsfield v. Danone US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20193:19-cv-00589California6,171 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EVLYN ANDRADE-HEYMSFIELD, Case No.: 19-cv-589-CAB-WVG SHANNON KAWLECKI, and PAMELA 11 PARRA, on behalf of themselves and all ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS others similarly situated, [Doc. No. 12] Plaintiffs, v. DANONE US, INC., Defendant. 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). [Doc. No. 12.] The motion has been fully briefed and the Court deems it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Evlyn Andrade-Heymsfield, Shannon Kawlecki and Pamela Parra, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated, filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) in this putative consumer class action complaint against Defendant Danone US, Inc. (“Danone”) on May 24, 2019. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.