Zhuravleva

Zhuravleva v. United States Polo Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20193:19-cv-01497California732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRINA ZHURAVLEVA, Case No.: 19cv1497-L(LL)

Plaintiff,

CLASS ACTION

v.

ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO

UNITED STATES POLO

STATE COURT

ASSOCIATION,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Defendant United States Polo Association removed this false advertising action from state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1441. For the reasons stated below, the action is remanded. "Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution or statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree. It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction, and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction." Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (citations omitted). Consistent with the limited jurisdiction of federal courts, the removal statute is strictly construed against removal. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.