McKinney

McKinney v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20193:19-cv-01485California1,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 TRACEE McKINNEY, Case No. 19-cv-1485-BAS-MDD 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; AND DIRECTING

v. U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT

SERVICE PURSUANT TO

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) Defendant. [ECF No. 2] 16 17 Plaintiff Tracee McKinney filed a complaint against Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) alleging BofA breached the parties’ mortgage agreement. (ECF No. 1.) Along with her complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a litigant who because of indigency is unable to pay the required fees or security to commence a legal action may petition the court to proceed without making such payment. The determination of indigency falls within the district court’s discretion. Cal. Men’s Colony v. Rowland, 939 F.2d 854, 858…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.