Pamintuan

Pamintuan v. Kaminskiy Design and Remodeling Lic.922807 Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20193:19-cv-00374California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SHANE RYAN PAMINTUAN, Case No.: 19-cv-374-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO ENFORCE

v. SETTLEMENT AND DISMISS

ACTION

KAMINSKIY DESIGN AND

REMODELING LIC.922807

12 CORPORATION, [Doc. No. 19] 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Enforce Settlement and Dismiss Action. [Doc. No. 19.] Upon review, the Court deems it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement and dismiss this action is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Shane Ryan Pamintuan filed this action against Defendant Kaminskiy Design and Remodeling Lic.922807 Corporation on February 25, 2019. [Doc. No. 1.1] On May 23, 2019, the parties attended an Early Neutral Evaluation Conference with the Court before Magistrate Judge Skomal. [Doc. No. 10.] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.