Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20193:18-cv-00840California7,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:18-cv-840-GPC-BGS

IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORY, LP

consolidated with 3:18-cv-1882-GPC- LITIGATION

BGS

ORDER

(1) GRANTING

COUNTERCLAIMANTS’ MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND

AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT [ECF

18 No. 92]; 19 (2) DENYING OUTLAW’S MOTION 20 TO STRIKE [ECF No. 99]; 21 (3) OVERRULING OUTLAW’S

EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS [ECF

No. 100.]

24 Before the Court is Defendant/Counterclaimant Roma Mikha, Inc., and Third-Party 25 Plaintiffs NMRM, Inc. and Skyline Market, Inc.’s (collectively, “Counterclaimants’”) 26 July 1, 2019 motion for leave to file a Second Amended Counterclaim and Third-Party 27 Complaint to add three new defendants. (ECF No. 92.) On July 15, 2019, 28 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Outlaw Laboratory, LP (“Outlaw”) filed a response brief in opposition; on July 22, 2019, Counterclaimants returned a reply. (ECF Nos. 97, 98.) 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.