Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20193:18-cv-01927California6,946 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES Case No.: 18cv1927 JM (MSB)

RESEARCH, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

INSTITUTE, INC.,

Defendant. 15 Defendant Project Management Institute, Inc. (“PMI”) moves the court to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 28.) Plaintiff Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. (“WTRI”) opposes. (Doc. No. 29.) For the reasons discussed below, the court grants in part and denies in part PMI’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND The court hereby incorporates the detailed recitation of alleged facts in its prior order. (Doc. No. 24.) In short, this action arises out of an unsuccessful endeavor to jointly develop educational project management software. On September 8, 2015, PMI and WTRI 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.