Mapp

Mapp v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20193:19-cv-00927California2,512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TIMOTHY MAPP, Case No.: 19-CV-927-CAB-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, [Doc. No. 14] Defendant. 17 18 19 20 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. [Doc. No. 14.] Although Plaintiff has not opposed the motion, the Court deems it suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. I. BACKGROUND On May 17, 2019, Plaintiff Timothy Mapp, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendant San Diego County (“the County”). [Doc. No. 1.] The complaint appears to allege a single violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [Id. at 6. ] According to the complaint, the “child support agency in San Diego county has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.