Norris
Norris v. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICKY EARL NORRIS, Case No.: 18-CV-0469 W (KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [DOC. 15] ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel, the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing’s (“Counsel”), motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Counsel requests $10,000.00 in fees, with a credit to Plaintiff for the EAJA fees previously paid in the amount of $777.39. On August 13, 2019, Defendant filed a response taking no position on the request. (See Def’s Response [Doc. 16].) Plaintiff was served with the motion and notified that any response had to be filed within 14 days. (Mot. [Doc. 15] 2:1–13.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Counsel’s attorney’s fee request. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted, and without oral argument. See Civ.L.R. 7.1.d. For…