Quesada-Gamino

Quesada-Gamino v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20193:19-cv-00561California3,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 16-cr-01927-BAS-1 Case No. 19-cv-00561-BAS Plaintiff,

v. ORDER:

JOSE FREDDY QUESADA-GAMINO, (1) DENYING MOTION UNDER 28 Defendant. U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET

ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE

18 (ECF No. 43); AND 19 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND

AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF No. 45)

Presently before the Court is Defendant Jose Freddy Quesada-Gamino’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (ECF No. 43) and Motion for Discovery and an Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 45). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Vacate under § 2255 and DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Discovery and an Evidentiary Hearing. 28 I. UNDERLYING CRIMINAL CASE The Government originally charged Mr. Quesada-Gamino with importing methamphetamine and cocaine. (ECF Nos. 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.