McCurley

McCurley v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20193:17-cv-00986California4,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MCCURLEY, DAN DEFOREST, individually and on Case No. 17-cv-00986-BAS-AGS behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

Plaintiffs, AND DENYING IN PART v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED

CLASS NOTICE PLAN

ROYAL SEAS CRUISES, INC.,

[ECF No. 100] Defendant.

16 Plaintiffs John McCurley and Dan DeForest move for approval of their proposed class notice plan. (ECF Nos. 100, 103.) Plaintiffs’ motion presents two separate and alternative notice plans—the proposed Direct Notice Plan and the proposed Publication Notice Plan—for which Plaintiffs seek court approval of only one, preferably publication notice. Defendant Royal Seas Cruises, Inc. (“Royal”) principally opposes the proposed Publication Notice Plan and argues that Plaintiffs’ proposed notice is otherwise incomplete. (ECF No. 102.) For the reasons herein, the Court grants Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.