Vasquez
Vasquez v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 HENRY VASQUEZ, Case No.: 18-cv-2097-GPC-MDD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 47]
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights Complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is currently incarcerated at in Salinas Valley State Prison. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s first request for appointed counsel was denied without prejudice on March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 21). On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed his second request for appointed counsel which the Court denied on August 16, 2019. (ECF Nos. 42, 45). On August 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a document providing additional arguments to construes this document as a third request for appointed counsel. Generally, a person has no right to counsel in civil actions. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Thus, federal…