Vasquez

Vasquez v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20193:18-cv-02097California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 HENRY VASQUEZ, Case No.: 18-cv-2097-GPC-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 47]

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights Complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is currently incarcerated at in Salinas Valley State Prison. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s first request for appointed counsel was denied without prejudice on March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 21). On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed his second request for appointed counsel which the Court denied on August 16, 2019. (ECF Nos. 42, 45). On August 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a document providing additional arguments to construes this document as a third request for appointed counsel. Generally, a person has no right to counsel in civil actions. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Thus, federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.