Alegre

Alegre v. Contreras

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20193:16-cv-02442California4,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY ALEGRE, et al., Case No.: 16-CV-02442-AJB-KSC Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART FEDERAL

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. DISMISS (Doc. No. 68) Defendants. 16 Before the Court is the United States, the Department of the Interior, and several employees acting in their official capacity (“Federal Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (Doc. No. 68.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Individual Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are taken from the TAC and construed as true for the limited purpose of resolving the instant motion. See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1247 (9th Cir. 2013). The facts of this case have been thoroughly detailed in previous documents, including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.