Watkins
Watkins v. Revak
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20193:19-cv-01000California2,176 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID DEAN WATKINS, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1000-JAH-WVG
CDCR #V-04739,
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR vs. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM AND
FOR SEEKING DAMAGES FROM
JUDGE BERNARD REVAK;
IMMUNE DEFENDANT PURSUANT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) TALETHA SUITTS, AND § 1915A(b) Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 I. Procedural History On May 28, 2019, David Dean Watkins (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) located in Corcoran, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. / / / Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). On July 3,…