Watkins

Watkins v. Revak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20193:19-cv-01000California2,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID DEAN WATKINS, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1000-JAH-WVG

CDCR #V-04739,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR vs. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM AND

FOR SEEKING DAMAGES FROM

JUDGE BERNARD REVAK;

IMMUNE DEFENDANT PURSUANT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA;

TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) TALETHA SUITTS, AND § 1915A(b) Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 I. Procedural History On May 28, 2019, David Dean Watkins (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) located in Corcoran, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. / / / Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). On July 3,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.