Appel
Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20193:18-cv-00873California6,913 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HOWARD APPEL, et al., Case No. 18-cv-873-BAS-MDD
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
BOSTON NATIONAL TITLE
AGENCY, LLC, [ECF No. 77]
Defendant.
17 Boston National Title Agency, LLC’s moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 77.) Plaintiffs Howard Appel, David Cohen, and Ke’e Partners LLC oppose the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 80). The Court finds resolution of this matter is suitable without the need for oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Boston National’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND In June 2017, Plaintiffs signed a Bidder Registration Agreement with Concierge Auctions, LLC, to participate in Concierge’s “Summer Portfolio Sale” 27 …