Storey

Storey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20193:17-cv-00023California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONTAZE A. STOREY, Case No.: 17cv23-LAB (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION; AND

DANIEL PARAMO,

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

Respondent. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 16 Petitioner Dontaze Storey, a prisoner in state custody, filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Bernard Skomal who, on March 22, 2019, issued his report and recommendation (the “R&R”). Judge Skomal’s R&R set forth a thorough account of the procedural history and analysis Storey’s claims, and recommended denying the petition. The Court granted three separate extensions of time for Storey to file his objections to the R&R, most recently extending the deadline to August 12, 2019. Still, he has filed no objections. A district court has jurisdiction to review a Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.