Garrison
Garrison v. Ringgold
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY GARRISON, an individual, Case No.: 19cv244-GPC(RBB) and CHRISTINE GARRISON, an 12 individual , ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERDEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs,
MOTION TO DISMISS
14 v. COUNTERCLAIM AS UNOPPOSED AND DENYING
REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III
PLAINTIFFS/COUNTERDEFENDANTS’
aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an
REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
individual, ROSEGOLD 17 INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware [Dkt. No. 20.] Partnership, and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a 19 California Corporation, 20 Defendants.
22 Before the Court is Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants’ motion to strike and dismiss the 23 counterclaims raised by Defendant/Counterclaimant against them. (Dkt. No. 20.) 24 Defendant did not file an opposition. On August 6, 2019, in reply, Plaintiffs asked the 25 Court to grant the motion in its entirety as unopposed pursuant to S.D. Local Civil Rule 26 7.1(f)(3)(c). (Dkt. No. 23.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court…