Hatcher
Hatcher v. Aurther
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HATCHER, Case No. 19-cv-00652-BAS-BLM
CDCR #BJ8474,
ORDER: Plaintiff, (1) DENYING MOTION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) [ECF No. 3] 15 OLIVA AURTHER, et al., (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR Defendants. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 18 19 Pro se Plaintiff Robert Hatcher, formerly housed at the San Diego Central Jail,1 has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not prepaid the full civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Instead, he has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 3). For the reasons herein, the Court denies Plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismisses this action without prejudice. 25 26 …