Turfley

Turfley v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20193:19-cv-01585California1,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RICHARD TURFLEY, Case No.: 19-cv-1585-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND SUA

CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al.,

SPONTE DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Defendants. 14 15 16 On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed a complaint that names the City of San Diego (the “City”), the San Diego Police Department (the “SDPD”), the County of San Diego (the “County”), and the “San Diego County Prosecutor” (the “Prosecutor”) as defendants. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not pay the requisite filings fees and instead filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Doc. No. 2.] As discussed below, Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP is granted, and the complaint is dismissed pursuant to the sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. Application to Proceed IFP Plaintiff moves to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.