Bell Northern Research, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20193:18-cv-01784California1,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 18cv1784-CAB(BLM) BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

v. RESPONSES TO WRITTEN DISCOVERY

HUAWEI DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.;

HUAWEI DEVICE (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.;

and HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., [ECF Nos. 78, 86, 90] 16 Defendants. 17 On June 6, 2019, in compliance with chambers rules, counsel for Plaintiff (“BNR”) and Defendants (collectively “Huawei”) contacted chambers regarding several discovery disputes. Counsel for the parties set forth their respective positions and agreed to engage in further meet and confer efforts in an attempt to resolve the disputes informally. On June 24, 2019, counsel for both BNR and Huawei called chambers again and informed the Court that they were unable to resolve the disputes. On June 25, 2019, the Court set a briefing schedule for Huawei’s motion to compel BNR’s responses to various written discovery. ECF No. 77. In compliance with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.