Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HIPOLITO DE LA ROSA DE LA Case No.: 18-cv-1649-WQH-MSB

ROSA,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 ANDREW SAUL, Acting 14 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 HAYES, Judge: 17 The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation issued 18 by United States Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg (ECF No. 18), pursuant to Plaintiff and 19 Defendant’s joint motion for judicial review (EFC No. 17), recommending that Plaintiff’s 20 request for reversal of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s decision and 21 remand be granted and Defendant’s request be denied. 22 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 23 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 24 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 25 report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in 26 part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The 27…