Murschel
Murschel v. Paramo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20193:17-cv-01142California1,661 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LANCE MURSCHEL, Case No.: 3:17-cv-1142-BTM-AGS
CDCR #P-04895
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 9 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO
D. PARAMO, Warden, et al., DISMISS; and
12 Defendants. 2) DIRECTING DEPUTY
ATTORNEY GENERAL TO
PROVIDE DEFENDANTS’
FORWARDING ADDRESSES IN
CONFIDENTIAL MEMO
16 17 18 19 Lance Murschel (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the civil rights action filed pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Procedural History On April 8, 2019, Defendant Melton filed a “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.” (ECF No. 31.) A hearing date was set for May 31, 2019. (Id. at 1.) However, instead of filing a response to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an…