Murschel

Murschel v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20193:17-cv-01142California1,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LANCE MURSCHEL, Case No.: 3:17-cv-1142-BTM-AGS

CDCR #P-04895

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 9 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO

D. PARAMO, Warden, et al., DISMISS; and

12 Defendants. 2) DIRECTING DEPUTY

ATTORNEY GENERAL TO

PROVIDE DEFENDANTS’

FORWARDING ADDRESSES IN

CONFIDENTIAL MEMO

16 17 18 19 Lance Murschel (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the civil rights action filed pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Procedural History On April 8, 2019, Defendant Melton filed a “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.” (ECF No. 31.) A hearing date was set for May 31, 2019. (Id. at 1.) However, instead of filing a response to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.