Skylar

Skylar v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20193:19-cv-01581-MMA-NLSCalifornia1,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HELEN SKYLAR, Case No.: 19cv1581-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; and Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. (2) DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2]

21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Helen Skylar’s complaint seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s decision and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1-2. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motion to proceed IFP. I. Screening Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) A complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), is subject to a mandatory and sua sponte review by the Court. Lopez v. Smith,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.