K.J.P.
K.J.P. v. San Diego, County of
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 K.J.P. a minor, and K.P.P., a minor, Case No.: 15-cv-02692-H-MDD 12 individually, by and through their mother, LOAN THI MINH NGUYEN, who also ORDER GRANTING IN PART sues individually and as successor in PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RE-TAX 14 interest to her now deceased husband COSTS Lucky Phounsy, and KIMBERLY NANG CHANTHAPHANH, individually, [Doc. No. 201.] 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., 19 Defendants.
21 Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to re-tax costs. On August 7, 2019, 22 Plaintiffs filed a motion to re-tax costs and asked this Court to “stay any award of costs to 23 Defendant pending resolution of Plaintiffs’ appeal.” (Doc. No. 201.) Santee and Lakeside 24 Defendants both opposed the motion. (Doc. Nos. 202 and 203.) Plaintiffs replied to 25 Defendants’ oppositions on September 3, 2019. (Doc. No. 203.) The Court, pursuant to its 26 discretion under Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines that Plaintiffs’ motion to re-tax costs is 27 appropriate for resolution without oral argument, submits the motion on the parties’ papers,…