Reynolds

Reynolds v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20193:11-cv-01256California266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREVOR REYNOLDS; HEATHER Case No.: 11cv1256-JAH (AGS) REYNOLDS; H.R., a minor; R.R., a 11 minor – by and through their Guardian Ad ORDER GRANTING JOINT Litem, Janice White, REQUEST TO EXTEND STAY OF

PROCEEDINGS AND RESETTING

Plaintiffs,

TELEPHONIC STATUS

v. CONFERENCE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN

DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY;

POLINSKY CHILDRENS CENTER;

MAYA BRYSON; SHARI MEDEIROS;

18 LAURA ZETMEIR, and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. 21 Plaintiffs Trevor Reynolds, Heather Reynolds, H.R., a minor, and R.R., also a minor, both through their guardian ad litem, Kirk Howland (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants County of San Diego, Maya Bryson, Shari Medeiros, Laura Zetmeir, Cheryl Berglund, and Kristie Campbell (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel filed a joint status report, pursuant to the Court’s May10, 2019 Order, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.