Anderson
Anderson v. Does 1-6
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA ANDERSON., Case No. 18cv2137-JAH (WVG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. No. 20) DOES 1-6, et al., Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants Mark Held, San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, and San Diego Transit Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff Lisa Anderson’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Doc. No. 18). See Doc. No. 20. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. See Doc. No. 22. The Motion is fully briefed. After careful consideration of the pleadings filed by both parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) is dismissed with prejudice. // // // …