Storey

Storey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20193:17-cv-00023California1,356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONTAZE A. STOREY, Case No.: 17cv23-LAB (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

OBJECTIONS; AND

DANIEL PARAMO,

Respondent. ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER

TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

18 Petitioner Dontaze Storey, a prisoner in state custody, filed a petition for writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on January 3, 2017. The petition was referred 20 to Magistrate Judge Bernard Skomal, and later to Magistrate Judge Michael Berg for a 21 report and recommendation. After lengthy proceedings during which Storey’s first three 22 motions for a stay and abeyance were denied, he presented his unexhausted claims to the 23 California Supreme Court, which denied them. The Court then denied as moot his fourth 24 motion for a stay and abeyance, and he filed his amended petition. 25 After receiving briefing, Judge Berg on March 22, 2019…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.