Castillo

Castillo v. Renteria

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20193:17-cv-02104California1,735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANDRO LEONEL GONZALEZ Case No.: 17cv2104-CAB-WVG

CASTILLO,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 38] v. AND GRANTING MOTION FOR 14 SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No.

A. RENTERIA, et al.,

30] Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Leandro Leonel Gonzalez Castillo (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner 18 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on October 12, 2017, 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 claiming violation of his constitutional rights under the First 20 and Eighth Amendments. [Doc. No. 1.] On March 27, 2019, Defendants A. Renteria, R. 21 Segovia, and L. Romero (“Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. [Doc. No. 22 30.] On April 24 and 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed opposition to the motion for summary 23 judgment. [Doc. Nos. 32, 33.] On May 20, 2019, Defendants filed a reply to the 24 opposition. [Doc. No. 35.] 25 On August 5, 2019, Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo issued a Report and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.