Mavungo

Mavungo v. Sessions

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20193:19-cv-01431California333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS MAVUNGO, Case No.: 19cv1431-LAB (JLB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DIRECTING

v. NOTIFICATION OF

PETITIONER’S ATTORNEY

JEFFERSON SESSIONS III, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Thomas Mavungo (also identified as Thomas Mavungu or Mavungo Thomas) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under U.S.C. § 2241, asking that he be granted asylum and that his order of removal not be carried out. He has apparently already sought removal by a petition for review, unsuccessfully. This Court has no jurisdiction to review final orders of removal under § 2241. See Puri v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2006); Alvarez-Barajas v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir. 2005). Federal jurisdiction is presumed to be lacking, Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994), and the party invoking the Court’s jurisdiction must establish it. See Spokeo, Inc. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.