Brangwynne

Smith v. Brangwynne

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20193:19-cv-00620California1,600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS SMITH, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0620-CAB-MSB

CDCR #AX-8010,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DISMISSING DEFENDANT SAN

DIEGO CENTRAL JAIL;

DEPUTY K. BRANGWYNNE; AND

DEPUTY S. CARDA; DEPUTY

C. FICKETT; DEPUTY J. HANN; 2) DIRECTING USMS TO EFFECT

DEPUTY J. KLIEBENSTEIN; SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED

DEPUTY A. MENDOZA; COUNTY OF COMPLAINT

SAN DIEGO; DOES 1-5, Defendants. 21 22 I. Procedural History On April 2, 2019, Plaintiff, Dennis Smith, currently a state inmate housed at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”) located in Corcoran, California, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). In addition, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff alleged his constitutional rights were violated when he was a pretrial detainee housed at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”) in 2018. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.