Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20193:17-cv-00241California8,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANDRO LEONEL GONZALEZ, Case No.: 3:17-cv-00241-GPC-BGS

CDCR #V-74928,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, DEGUZMAN’S MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PURSUANT TO

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 M. DeGUZMAN, et al.,

16 Defendants. [ECF No. 67] 17 18 Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 by Defendant M. DeGuzman (ECF No. 67). After he was notified of the requirements for opposing summary judgment pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 67-4), and granted an extension of time (ECF No. 70), Plaintiff filed his Opposition (“Opp’n”) (ECF No. 71). DeGuzman filed no Reply. On June 10, 2019, the Court found the matter suitable for disposition on the moving papers and ordered the matter submitted without oral argument pursuant to S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1.d.1 (ECF No. 72). On June 18, 2019,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.