Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAN SEGOBIA II, Case No.: 19cv1661-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the

Social Security Administration, [ECF No. 3] Defendant.

17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Julian Segobia II’s complaint seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s decision and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 3. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to proceed IFP. I. Screening Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) A complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), is subject to a mandatory and sua sponte review by the Court. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court must dismiss the complaint if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may…