Yaldiz

United States Department of Homeland Security v. Yaldiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20193:19-cv-01752California1,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATE DEPARTMENT OF CASE NO. 3:19-cv-1752-GPC-WVG

HOMELAND SECURITY,

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

ENFORCEMENT,

APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY

13 Plaintiffs, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND REQUEST FOR vs.

EXPEDITED PRELIMINARY

HAMZA YALDIZ, INJUNCTION HEARING

16 Defendant. [ECF No. 2.]

18 On September 12, 2019, Plaintiff U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 19 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE” or “Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint, ECF 20 No. 1, and an Ex Parte Application for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order, ECF 21 No. 2, to allow Plaintiff to (1) immediately and involuntary hydrate Mr. Hamza Yaldiz 22 (“Defendant”), (2) perform physical evaluations on Defendant, and (3) restrain Defendant 23 in the process, if necessary. Plaintiff requests this “to prevent injury, organ failure, or loss 24 of life due to Defendant’s self-imposed hunger strike.” ECF No. 1 at ¶ 8. This motion is 25 supported by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.