Navarro

Navarro v. Gaslamp Tavern LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 20193:18-cv-01725California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY NAVARRO, Case No.: 18-cv-1725-WQH-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. GASLAMP TAVERN LLC d/b/a

GASLAMP TAVERN, BAHYAG

14 INC., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 HAYES, Judge: 17 The matter before the Court is the review of the Report and Recommendation issued 18 by United States Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo (ECF No. 36), pursuant to Plaintiff 19 and Defendant Gaslamp Tavern LLC d/b/a Gaslamp Tavern’s Joint Motion of Dismissal 20 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) (EFC No. 27), recommending that 21 the Parties’ request that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice as to all 22 parties be granted. 23 The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 24 magistrate judge are set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 25 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 26 report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.